Play Types: Pass Rush

NFL Pass vs. Rush Analysis

The eternal debate in NFL strategy centers on the balance between rushing and passing plays. As the league has evolved, teams have developed diverse approaches to moving the ball downfield, each with their own risks and rewards. Through a detailed analysis of NFL play data, we can uncover patterns that reveal how teams utilize these two fundamental aspects of football and their impact on game outcomes.

Scroll to explore

Team Performance

Looking at the relationship between rushing and passing yards, we see a fascinating disparity in how teams distribute their offensive production. While most teams accumulate between 15,000 and 35,000 passing yards compared to 6,000-16,000 rushing yards, there's significant variation in their approaches. Some teams maintain a balanced attack, while others lean heavily on their passing game, reflecting both their roster strengths and offensive philosophies. The average yards per play further highlights this distinction, with passing plays typically gaining more yards but coming with increased risk.

Play Outcome Breakdown

The distribution of play outcomes reveals the risk-reward nature of passing versus rushing. Passing plays show a wider variance in outcomes, ranging from incomplete passes and interceptions to big gains downfield. In contrast, rushing plays demonstrate more consistent, albeit usually smaller, gains. This visualization helps explain why teams often rely on rushing plays in critical situations where ball security is paramount, while relying on passing plays when large yardage gain is necessary.

Scoring Drive Distribution

Analyzing scoring drives provides insight into how teams construct their successful offensive series. While passing plays often feature prominently in quick-scoring drives, especially when teams are trailing, rushing plays become increasingly important in longer drives that help control game tempo and wear down defensive units. This balance between explosive passing plays and methodical rushing attacks often defines a team's scoring identity.

Always passing is bad as it's predictable and is likely to eventually lead to an interception. Always rushing is bad as it's not explosive enough to consistently gain enough yards. Therefore, a balance of around 45% passing and 55% rushing is best.

Turnover Location

The spatial distribution of turnovers tells a compelling story about risk management. Interceptions tend to occur more frequently in certain areas of the field, particularly on longer passing attempts, while fumbles on rushing plays show a more uniform distribution. This pattern influences play-calling decisions, especially in different field positions where the risk of turning over the ball could dramatically swing game momentum.

Game Context Analysis

The influence of game situation on play-calling reveals how teams adapt their rushing-passing balance. In early downs with manageable distances, teams maintain a relatively even distribution between runs and passes. However, as downs progress or in obvious passing situations (like third-and-long or when trailing late), the balance shifts dramatically toward passing plays. This visualization demonstrates how game context forces teams to sometimes abandon their preferred offensive balance.

Game Situation

1 5 10 15 20+

Conclusions

Through this comprehensive analysis of NFL play-calling patterns, we've uncovered several key insights about how teams approach the run-pass balance in different situations.

Run and pass plays reveal intriguing patterns:

  • Successful run plays occur at a higher rate, but successful pass plays more often result in first downs
  • Pass plays have double the chance of scoring on successful attempts.

Scoring drives can reveal what is the most efficient and most used play distribution used to score:

  • The most efficient distribution is 45% pass and 55% run, scoring on 30% of drives
  • The most common scoring distribution is 40% pass and 60% run, with a 15% scoring rate

Positions of turnover plays show some interesting insights:

  • Interceptions are most common in the middle of the field, between the offense’s 30-50 yard line
  • Fumbles are more evenly distributed and rarer, the most occurring between the offense's 10-20 yard line

Different game situations call for different play calls:

  • Teams generally favor pass plays over run plays across most field positions
  • Pass plays are favored even more when trailing by a touchdown or more
  • Plays become more balanced, leaning more to runs when leading by a touchdown or more
  • Run plays dominate with 1 yard to go, while pass plays are heavily favored with 20 yards to go

Implications

These findings underscore the intricate nature of NFL play-calling and the critical role of situational awareness in football strategy. By understanding these patterns, teams can better predict and counter opponents' tendencies while optimizing their own play-calling decisions. This data extends beyond defensive strategy; it empowers head coaches and play callers to make informed choices about whether to risk potential turnovers, aim for scoring drives, or prioritize yardage and first downs at various points in the game. Additionally, these insights are valuable for NFL fans who may not understand certain play calls. This website offers an interactive platform for fans to explore and understand the strategic reasoning behind play selections during different phases of a game.

About This Project

This visualization project was developed as part of CS4460 at Georgia Tech. It uses D3.js to analyze and visualize NFL play-by-play data, providing interactive insights into football strategy and decision-making. This project was developed using data from: NFL Play-by-Play Data